Developing a Healthy Attitude to Competition
PART ONE
Introduction
There are many players,
coaches, parents and sports psychologists who understand, to different
degrees, the ideal mind-set athletes must develop in order to perform at
their optimum level.
However, as in the case
of bio-mechanics, the real issue is less ‘what’ and more ‘how’ do we
transfer this information to the player, in a manner in which it can be
digested so that both behavior and experience are impacted?
I hear many experts
extolling the virtues of positive thinking and urging players to just show
positive emotions or play with confidence.
But how is it possible to be positive when I feel frustrated and
angry or to play with confidence when I am full of doubt?
Some how this fundamental question is largely left unaddressed; and
when it is addressed, simple techniques are offered that may have some
short-term benefits, but no long-term solutions.
In all these cases
solutions are sought within the mind.
Negative thoughts have to be replaced by positive thoughts; but
thoughts still remain. The
quandary is that as long as mind is active, ‘problems’ will persist.
Traditional thinking looks for answers within the mind; wholistic
tennis seeks to introduce you to an inner space beyond mind.
Everything we know about the zone state seems to indicate that the
ideal performance state does not happen to an individual whose conscious
mind is active (thoughts).
Mind manipulation,
pushing the mind in the direction you desire, may yield some success, but it
will certainly not be sustained and perhaps more importantly, it will never
lead to enjoying the process in a state of relaxed intensity.
Coaches and parents
admonish their students for being angry on the court and then punish them
for such behavior. While, I am
not saying there is no room for punishment, certainly some types of behavior
are so unsavory that they need to be stopped immediately by any means
possible. However, punishment
belies the fact that being angry is not a choice, just as punishment is not
a solution. No one consciously
chooses the pain that is anger and while forced consequences may require
players to change outward behavior, they do nothing to transform the inner
root that gives birth to such behavior.
So how do we nurture
the silence and peacefulness (relaxed intensity) that is associated with
peak athletic performance?
Whenever this question is asked, it is inevitably answered with a list of
corrective techniques that, in my opinion, do not help on any long-term
level. The player may feel some
immediate relief, but the symptoms will continue to return and often with
greater force. The truth is
that there are no simple solutions and all techniques are stop-gap measures,
which do not go to the root of the issue.
So, what is the root?
Ironically, the answer to the question lies not in adding something,
but in taking things away. It
lies, not in developing skills (coping), but in destroying the false beliefs
and preconceived notions that are a part of our conditioning.
What is conditioning?
How are false beliefs
created? How can we drop the
preconceived notions that we have?
We seem to ‘know’ certain things and yet in the heat of the moment we
seem to ‘forget’ and our actions belie this ‘knowing’.
How is it possible to forget?
Did we really ‘know’ in the first place?
Intellectual knowledge
is different from existential knowing.
The former will not change behavior on the long-term, while the
latter cannot help but totally transform you.
How do we get to this state of existential knowing? Before we answer
this question, let us understand the situation as it is, which I think
everyone can agree upon.
All these false beliefs
have been given to us by others or are the result of our misinterpretations.
An accumulation of these false beliefs, all arising from the past,
taken collectively are our conditioning.
Conditioning is the
tinted glasses through which we look at life.
From an early age and often in extremely subtle ways we are ‘taught’
what is ‘right’ and what is ‘wrong’ from those who have complete power over
us and from whom we will do anything for and whose approval we desperately
seek.
A simple, but extremely
powerful example is the circumstances under which we praise youngsters.
This seems like a pretty innocuous activity; a child succeeds at
something we generously offer praise.
However, this innocent interaction can and does have far-reaching
effects on the child.
Youngsters want, need and are often constantly seeking the approval of
authority figures in order to validate their own sense of being at a time
when their sense of self is weak.
Sometimes praise is
consciously used by coaches and parents to reinforce a particular type of
behavior. Just as circus
trainers may use treats to ‘train’
animals, we use praise
to manipulate the child into doing what we want.
I am not questioning the intentions of the authority figures doing
this, but simply suggesting that although immediate goals may be met in
changing outward behavior in this way, deeper inner issues are being
created, which will affect the youngsters as their move into adolescence and
even beyond into adulthood.
At other times, praise
is a ‘natural’ expression of joy and pride the parent or coach feels when
their ward excels at something.
This feeling is simply their own egos being stroked through the success of
‘their’ students or children.
Praise is sometimes
given generously in the mistaken belief that this will make the child feel
good about him or her self.
This may be true on the short-term, but the long-term ramifications are
something diametrically opposite.
Success cannot be the source of feeling good about oneself because
success will not always happen, but one needs to feel good about oneself at
all times under all conditions.
Regardless of the
motivation, the effect of praise remains the same.
Before the child has found his own center, he wants and needs the
approval of his loved ones.
Praise is equated with love and it is learned at an early age that love
comes with success. In this
way, youngsters identify success with being loved and getting approval.
Conversely, when failure or not doing well is greeted with a reaction
different from the first, this feeling is reinforced.
The truth is that the
fear of losing is coming from somewhere much deeper within the human psyche;
it is coming from our unconscious mind.
We associate winning and losing with our self-worth.
The ‘happiness’ and ‘celebration’ of our successes, regardless of how
small, by all those around us from an early age became associated in our
mind with our fundamental need to be loved and accepted.
That is why this fear is not so easy to dismiss, even after
identifying the crippling way in it affects our performance.
The best thing coaches
and parents can do to avoid this is to give praise only for effort and
attitude, since these are the only two things that any of us have any
control over anyway. In
addition, praise and love can be given generously at any time, except after
an achievement so the chances of confusion arising are less.
Praise for success
arises from the coach’s or parent’s own value system.
This can only change when we understand that youngsters should only
engage in these activities for themselves and any intrinsic joy they may
derive from them. By
interjecting too much praise or interest in how they do (compared to
others), their motivation becomes distorted and now the focus becomes more
the approval it elicits rather than the activity itself.
We all have different abilities in different areas and the value in
the outer activities is less about excelling and more about the inner
qualities these activities can help nurture.
The child needs to know
that love and acceptance from those closest to her is unconditional and
certainly not dependent on how well she does in school or in the sports
arena. Obviously, this is not
the conscious intention of the parent or coach, but it is amazing how many
young individuals interpret it in this way.
So conditioning is
acting unconsciously. It is
repeating past behavior and being unable to see the present situation as
unique requiring a unique response.
The antidote to conditioned reactions is to be more conscious and to
respond to each situation on merit as if seeing it for the first time
without bringing in any preconceived ideas or values from the past.
It is about taking off the tinted glasses and seeing exactly what is.
This is freedom.
Conditioning is a type
of mental slavery because unconsciously we are doing things for the wrong
reasons. Fulfilling basic
physical, emotional and spiritual needs are the very foundation of the human
experience. All basic drive and
ambition is rooted in fulfilling these needs.
On the outer level it seems we design goals for one reason, but
unconsciously everything we seek on the outer, all our goals, ambitions and
dreams are really an attempt to fulfill inner needs.
Unfortunately, the outer accomplishments can never fill the inner
void, consequently no amount of achieving or becoming will bring the peace
of mind we ultimately seek.
It is said that 90% of
the mind is unconscious and only 10% conscious and that is why it is so
difficult to change behavior because much of our behavior arises from an
area we have ‘no control’ over.
If this is true, then do we really have choice?
Part of the frustration coaches and parents feel with their
youngsters is that they always feel players have a choice to behave the way
they do, but is that true? Can
an unconscious person be free to choose?
Moving from unconsciousness to consciousness
If our actions are
mostly arising from our unconscious mind, what can we do to extricate
ourselves from this prison which is not of our making, but yet our
responsibility? How can we
become more conscious and therefore more in control of our outer situation?
We, as tennis players can see the value of being more conscious as we
play because that is in fact the zone state from where peak athletic
performance happens. However,
the irony is that experiencing this emotional state has nothing at all to do
with tennis.
What I am saying is
that the biggest obstacle to being the best tennis player you can be has
nothing at all to do with tennis.
It has to do with the mind.
It has got to do with being more conscious as you play.
The physical movements can and actually have to be become unconscious
(automatic: this is what is commonly referred to as muscle memory), but the
inner experience has to be conscious.
Being conscious means being process-oriented, it means being present,
it means being in the here and now and playing each point one at a time in a
relaxed frame of mind.
Desire
The biggest obstacle to
being present, and therefore conscious, is desire.
It is desire that triggers mental activity because the mind is
constantly planning and scheming how to achieve it’s goal; or it is dreaming
of how life will be when the goal is achieved (it is never as good as we
imagine); or there is fear of the consequences of not achieving our dream
(this too is never as bad as we imagine!).
These are the type of stories created by the mind that prevent us
from performing at our optimum level.
The greater our desire, the harder it seems to be to be conscious.
The problem is that if
we take desire away then 99% (especially true of competitive or high
performance players, but perhaps a slight exaggeration for recreational
players) of tennis players will stop playing tennis.
Most people’s sole motivation lies in attaining the outer rewards
(ego-gratification, which can be subtle at times) that comes with success.
How many players would train as hard, hit as many balls and be so
obsessed with improvement if there was not, at least the promise of
something tangible to be gained at the end of the road (even seeking
improvement is a desire)?
The irony is that if we
look at most players who have attained ‘success’ (outer) it is clear that
the single most common quality they all possess is intense desire.
However, this intense desire has also rendered their experience
(inner) painful.
This is the almost
comical situation we find ourselves in.
Desire can be the catalyst that can motivate us to achieve ‘great’
things (outer), but this same single-minded focus will also be the source of
all the pain (inner) we experience along the journey.
This it seems is the price of on-court success.
The individuals, who are willing to pay this price, do so because
they see great value in the outer and are disconnected from any awareness of
the inner.
Is it possible to have
both the apple and eat it?
Desire: attached or detached?
To live in this world
without intention is impossible and desire is nothing but intention.
So intention is very natural and will not inherently cause us pain.
The root of our pain is
not in the wanting; it is in the attachment to the wanting.
In other words, to have a desire to be the best tennis player in our
high school, college, club, region, state, country or even the world will
not cause us pain by itself, but if we refuse to even entertain the
possibility of not achieving this goal, we will struggle.
This inability to accept any scenario except the one we desire is the
root cause of our inner pain.
Another way of talking
about this is to differentiate between attached desire and detached desire.
When attached desire is
present, the process is always painful regardless of whether the goal is
achieved or not. The mind may
not ‘feel’ the pain so much because of the focus on the outer, but
insensitivity to the pain will not lessen its affect on both the body and
the mind in the form of tension and stress.
The other problem is that deep down many individuals are so obsessed
with their goals that they convince themselves that the ends do justify the
means; so the series of painful moments are accepted as the ‘normal’ price
to be paid to achieve one’s goal.
Detached desire,
however, is the ability to have a goal and work as hard as one possibly can
towards that goal and understand that is all one can do.
Detached desire comes from the awareness that one has no control over
the result; we can try to win, but no one can guarantee winning or hitting
great shots every time. If they
could, why would anyone ever consciously choose to lose or make an error?